A Los Angeles probate judge will allow Britney Spears to choose her own attorney, the first big change in the pop star’s case since she unloaded in court last month, condemning the “abusive” conservatorship that controls her life.
On Wednesday, Judge Brenda Penny granted Spears’ request to hire Mathew Rosengart, a former federal prosecutor-turned-skilled litigator, to be her lawyer in the singer’s ongoing effort to end her 13-year conservatorship, under which she has little control over her finances or important life decisions.
Spears, who dialed into the hearing, spoke for about 15 minutes and became emotional, saying she wants an “investigation” of the alleged abuse.
She also reiterated that she wants her father, James “Jamie” Spears, out as a co-conservator, and that she refuses to undergo more medical assessments, which she called “stupid psych tests.”
“I’m not willing to sit with anybody at this point to be evaluated,” she told the judge. “I want to press charges for abuse. Instead of investigating my capacity, I want an investigation on my dad.”
She also said she wants Jodi Montgomery, the state-appointed conservator of her person, to continue in that role.
Spears broke down and cried while she spoke. The judge stopped her twice to ask that she speak more slowly because the court reporter couldn’t keep up. Spears was still crying as she said, “My dad needs to be removed today.”
Jamie Spears’ lawyer, Vivian Thoreen, pushed back on a variety of issues, including questioning why Montgomery has been allowed to stay as a conservator after Britney Spears criticized Montgomery at the hearing last month.
Thoreen also challenged other elements of what the singer said, and questioned why she was allowed to speak at length but “no one else has been afforded the opportunity.”
“Many of her characterizations and memories are just incorrect,” Thoreen said.
At the previous hearing, Britney Spears alleged that she’s forced to use an intrauterine device (IUD) and isn’t allowed to remove it in order to have more children. On Wednesday, Thoreen said there’s no fixed order that precludes her from making informed medical decisions.
“I’m not sure Miss Spears understands she can make medical decisions and have birth control implanted or not,” Thoreen said.
The hearing promised the possibility that some momentous developments might ensue and some decisions might be put off – again.
At least one of those decisions deferred until later included Montgomery’s request for more money for enhanced security due to death threats. Jamie Spears has opposed this, and the two have engaged in dueling recriminations via legal documents filed in the case.
Another hearing in the case to resolve other issues was set for Sept. 29.
The issue of most concern to Britney Spears and fans behind the #FreeBritney movement – whether she is freed from the onerous restrictions of a 13-year-old state-imposed guardianship – was not decided.
To date, Spears still has not filed the formal legal document seeking to end her conservatorship, as required. And during her impassioned June 23 court oration, she declared she won’t tolerate another medical assessment, also required.
She can refuse, Nelson said, but the judge could cite that refusal as a factor in potentially ruling against Britney’s desire to end the conservatorship.
‘I am traumatized’:Read Britney Spears’ full statement from her conservatorship hearing
Britney Spears dialed in remotely for the hearing, as did her father and her mother, Lynne Spears, separately. The hearing was not similarly accessible to the media or to the public, after the June 23 hearing was illegally live-streamed in violation of the judge’s orders.
Britney Spears, 39, wants her father gone from the conservatorship, accusing him and his co-conservators of being “abusive.”
She also resents having to foot the bill for her father’s high legal and public-relations costs as he fights to keep his role as co-conservator of her finances.
Her father’s legal team was expected to present his latest accounting of her finances, which he has helped build to its present state. She hasn’t worked since 2019 after abruptly suspending her Las Vegas residency.
Samuel Ingham, Britney Spears’ lawyer, who has represented her from the early months of her conservatorship, asked to resign that post July 7, following the June hearing when she claimed he had never told her she could seek to terminate the conservatorship. Penny approved his request to quit.
When the judge asked Britney Spears if she was comfortable with Rosengart, she replied, “I’ve spoken with him several times on the phone. I’ve met him. (I’m) comfortable.”
Towards the end of the 90-minute hearing, Rosengart questioned why Jamie Spears wanted to remain a conservator, aside from separate issues such as a financial interest.
“There’s a real question why Mr. Spears doesn’t voluntarily step aside today,” Rosengart declared.
“Mathew is a very aggressive attorney who is already setting himself up as Britney’s protector and advocate,” said trial attorney and legal analyst Heather Hansen. “He has also represented enough famous people to understand that working with the media and controlling the narrative is an important part of his job. He may be trying to do just that and show his zealousness for this case.”
The American Civil Liberties Union, which has long campaigned against California conservatorships as too easy to impose and difficult to escape, filed a friend-of-the-court brief late Monday, along with 25 civil and disability organizations, arguing that Britney should be able to pick her own lawyer under the 6th Amendment right to counsel.
“The (court) must recognize Spears’s autonomy and the rights of people with disabilities to live independent, self-directed lives as active members of their communities,” Zoe Brennan-Krohn, an attorney with the Disability Rights Project of the ACLU, said in a statement posted on the ACLU website. The civil rights organization also petitioned the court to serve as a neutral adviser to Spears.