WASHINGTON – House Democrats pushed Thursday during a tense and emotional debate for $1.9 billion to bolster security at the Capitol after the riot Jan. 6, but Republicans called it a rush to judgment that should wait until security reviews about how to spend the money are completed.
The House voted 213-212 to approve the bill, but the bill’s fate is uncertain in the Senate.
Before the vote, Appropriations Committee Chairman Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., pointed to the gallery above the House chamber and described huddling with colleagues as gunfire rang out. She said the need is dire and cannot wait for funding for Capitol Police and the National Guard.
“This bill is not about politics. It’s not about settling scores,” DeLauro said. “It’s about ensuring that every person who comes onto the Capitol grounds is safe and is protected. The funding is not optional.”
House Administration Committee Chairman Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., said her panel was studying how to improve Capitol Police.
“To fail to act today is really to turn your backs on the men and women who fought as Capitol Police officers just yards from where we stand today,” Lofgren said. “They were maimed. Their eyes gouged. They lost fingers. Some of them died. Don’t turn your backs on them and vote against this bill.”
Republicans said all lawmakers support Capitol Police and the National Guard who reinforced them. But Rep. Kay Granger of Texas, the top Republican on the Appropriations Committee, called the bill partisan. She said it was drafted without permanent spending decisions before security studies are completed.
“It also provides $200 million to establish a force within the D.C. National Guard to respond to incidents at the Capitol, raising serious concerns about the role of our military on American soil,” Granger said.
Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler of Washington, the top Republican on the subcommittee that oversees legislative spending, said spending should wait for an overhaul of the Capitol Police board.
“We need to know what we’re going to spend that money on,” she said.
The vote was nearly straight along party lines, but six Democrats didn’t support it. Reps. Cori Bush, D-Mo.; Ilhan Omar, D-Minn.; and Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., voted no. Reps. Jamaal Bowman, D-N.Y., Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.; and Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., voted present.
The three Democrats who voted against the bill issued a joint statement criticizing the effort to pour more money into police surveillance and force than in fighting violent white supremacy and disinformation.
“This bill prioritizes more money for a broken system that has long upheld and protected the white supremacist violence we saw on display that day,” said the statement from Bush, Omar and Pressley.
Republicans in both chambers questioned details about the spending proposal, which came before committees have finished hearings and a potential commission has studied what happened.
“I think we are pushing the pause button here,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said Tuesday.
The insurrection Jan. 6 temporarily halted the counting of Electoral College votes that confirmed Joe Biden beat former Donald Trump in the presidential election. Rioters overwhelmed police barricades and swarmed through the Capitol, vandalizing offices. Five people died, including Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick, who died the day after the attack from strokes, and 140 officers were injured.
The legislation includes funding to:
- Reimburse the National Guard $520.9 million and District of Columbia $66.8 million for their costs helping secure the Capitol. The bill would create a National Guard quick reaction force to augment Capitol Police during emergencies for $200 million.
- Bolster Capitol Police with $43.9 million more for overtime pay, retention bonuses and equipment replacement. The funding includes $3.3 million for the intelligence division, which watchdogs said needed more staff and training. Capitol Police would receive $8.6 million for body cameras, which metro police had during the attack.
- Prosecute suspects in the riot with an additional $39.5 million for U.S. attorneys and the Justice Department. More than 430 suspects have been charged as the FBI investigates.
- Redesign the Capitol landscape and potentially install retractable fencing for $250 million; harden windows and doors around the Capitol and surrounding office buildings for $162.7 million; create security vestibules at the north and south doors to the Capitol for $100 million.
- Improve security for lawmakers with $21.5 million and federal judges with $157.5 million.
The proposal is an emergency spending bill that would be considered in addition to routine annual bills that provide funding for Capitol Police and the National Guard. For comparison, the current year’s spending on the legislative branch, which includes Capitol Police, is about $4.2 billion.
Retired Army Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Buchanan told the House Administration Committee on Wednesday that Capitol Police paid officers for 720,000 hours of overtime last year.
“Aside from being both inefficient and expensive, all of that overtime effectively prevents training because there are no uncommitted personnel available to train,” Buchanan said.
House Sergeant at Arms William Walker, who had been commanding general of the D.C. National Guard, told that panel that Capitol Police must transform into a more active protective force, as threats against lawmakers doubled this year, compared with the same period last year.
“The increase in threats to members shows no sign of lessening,” Walker said.
Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, the top Republican on the Appropriations Committee, said Congress should study the spending methodically rather than “rush to judgment and throw a lot of money at something.”
“We’ve got to do it, and we’ve got to do it right,” Shelby said Tuesday.
The security legislation adopted some recommendations, such as the National Guard quick reaction force, from a task force headed by retired Lt. Gen. Russel Honoré. The report recommended an increase in Capitol Police staffing and a retractable fence for deployment in emergencies.
As lawmakers scrutinize security in hearings, proposals dealing with the National Guard and fencing have been contentious.
Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., who opposed erecting a permanent fence around the Capitol, questioned installing a retractable fence by suggesting it could take three years to build. He said a commission to study the riot could delay spending decisions.
“I think a commission will actually slow down us doing the things we know we need to do,” Blunt said.