The US Supreme Court on Thursday ended the Biden administration’s COVID-related moratorium on residential evictions. The ruling came in a challenge to the policy brought by a coalition of landlords and real estate trade groups.
The court said in an unsigned opinion (PDF) that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which imposed a new moratorium on Aug. 3, exceeded its authority in issuing the moratorium. The court’s conservative majority agreed with the challenger’s argument that the agency would have needed explicit congressional authorization to do so, the justices ruled in their 6-3 decision. Three liberal justices dissented.
“The CDC has imposed a nationwide moratorium on evictions in reliance on a decades-old statute that authorizes it to implement measures like fumigation and pest extermination,” the opinion said. “It strains credulity to believe that this statute grants the CDC the sweeping authority that it asserts.”
The CDC issued its order temporarily extending the moratorium for 60 days after the previous federal block on residential evictions expired on July 31. The temporary federal halt on evictions, which was to run until Oct. 3, was designed to halt evictions in areas hardest hit by COVID-19 and the delta variant.
About 44 million households — about one-third of the US population — are renters, many of which have been protected by some form of an eviction moratorium since Congress passed the initial CARES Act in March 2020. After that order lapsed in July 2020, the CDC began issuing its own moratoriums, saying the Public Health Service Act of 1944 gave it the authority to do so.
The 1944 statue authorizes the US surgeon general to “make and enforce such regulations” that are in the agency’s “judgment necessary to prevent the introduction, transmission, or spread of communicable diseases.”
In issuing the latest moratorium, the CDC argued that its decision was justified by the “recent, unexpected developments in the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the rise of the Delta variant.”
In his dissent, Justice Stephen G. Breyer sided with the CDC’s position. “The public interest strongly favors respecting the CDC’s judgment at this moment, when over 90% of counties are experiencing high transmission rates,” he wrote.
The White House didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
More to come
The information contained in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended as health or medical advice. Always consult a physician or other qualified health provider regarding any questions you may have about a medical condition or health objectives.